Wednesday, March 19, 2008

i fell asleep last night remembering these words:

'
And all work is empty save when there is love;
And when you work with love you bind yourself to yourself, and to one another, and to God.

And what is it to work with love?

It is to weave the cloth with threads drawn from your heart, even as if your beloved were to wear that cloth.
[...]

Work is love made visible.
And if you cannot work with love but only with distaste, it is better that you should leave your work and sit at the gate of the temple and take alms of those who work with joy.'

-from The Prophet by Khalil Gibran.

(i didn't remember it all word-for word. i'm not a machine, people. )

and then i remembered when it was most true. it was 2002, and i had my first, dribbling, taste of love. and i wrote a piece that still stands out as one of my best. i wrote it for him. more importantly, i wrote it like he was watching.


all my best work has been done hoping someone was watching.

vonnegut says as much in one of his autobiographical works. which one it is precisely escapes me, for which i am not embarrassed, because he repeats a lot between the various non-fictional tomes.
he emphasises the importance of having one listener. just one. one listener who you, the writer, believes is always reading, regardless of whether she/he is. for him, it was his sister. he wrote every joke knowing she would laugh at it.

the greeks, in a roundabout and somewhat more pantheological way, called them muses, and assigned them to various artforms.

my writing lacks grit, lacks some raw breed of beauty when i don't have a muse in mind. when who is watching is less important than writing something, anything down.

these days, i care who is reading. but the muscle is not conditioned.

(i am also much a dunce with computers. how to rid the first line of crappy font? maybe not copy and paste in future...)



Wednesday, March 05, 2008

cause i gotta have faith

and then, i'm not sure how, the conversation turned to religion.

he, unlike so many of us, was not inculcated at a tender age into a rigid set of beliefs. instead, at the age of 19, the pieces fell together. he, unlike so many of us, was able to choose his beliefs after assessing the evidence and his own moral fabric.

and, i, bashfully, sat adjacent, a raised-catholic-turned-secular-humanist. explained that i didn't choose secular humanism; rather, i read what secular humanism, generally, was, and noticed that it also described me.

but i don't call myself any one particular thing when it comes to faith, or belief, or religion. if anything, i feel i am defined by what i am not, in spiritual terms. i am not someone who attends services. i do not pray. i don't really feel compelled to behave in a certain way due to the promise of a consequence in the afterlife. i believe my consequences are as terrestrial as my actions. if i touch a flame, i will be burned.
i feel compelled to be decent to other people overall, which most would argue is a holdover from a christian upbringing. maybe so. don't most faith systems implore us to be 'good,' in order that society may be harmonious, productive, and pleasant? don't most systems contain tenets of social interaction which will benefit economic harmony as well as psychological welfare? isn't the social fabric intertwined with the harvest and the hunt?

i feel we often forget the roots of belief, or never knew them to begin with. animist faiths ascribe a spirit to every shrub, rodent, and tree, and acknowledge the failure of a hunt or crop as a failing on the part of the human community as participants in the interconnected web of existence. atonement is often, by modern standards, extreme. but necessary for the health of the community and its natural surroundings.

in some societies, spirituality and social harmony aide and abet one another. if a wrong has been committed within the community, every single member must participate in the subsequent penance in order for society to be healed. the cohesive factor of commonly held beliefs is, in this case, intrinsic to the health of society.

our contemporary interconnectedness, the ability to access information, to examine a thing from all sides, makes us incapable of understanding a community with limited information. are we happier now, with our infinite choices? or were we better off then, when everyone prayed to the same gods and hunted the same beasts? is a diversity of beliefs too divisive?

faith is something that has always fascinated, bewildered, and angered me. somewhere along the way during adolescence, i found the sheer amount of faiths in the world intensely fascinating, as though i had been raised eating only chocolate chip ice cream, had been slowly made aware of the other flavours in existence, and one day strolled into a large ice cream parlour, with a marble counter and big, crystal serving goblets. there was mint chocolate chip, so very much like chocolate chip but with a little something extra. there was vanilla, considered the classic, the most versatile, the most widely used in making the other ice creams. there was chocolate, the controversial one. my adolescent self considered it appalling to not even educate oneself about these other flavours before discussing their respective merits.

ice cream metaphors aside, spirituality has always interested me without necessarily inspiring me. i read up on other religions not because i was looking for something to believe in, but because i wanted to be educated. i wanted to converse intelligently rather than emotionally about faith, which is the trap so many fall into. the more i read, the more patterns began to emerge between the various structures, and my ability to ever subscribe to just one ebbed away. paired with the increasing tension over holy lands and holy words, my faith in faith waned.

asked what i believe in, i often respond that i believe in people. i have faith in the ultimate goodness of others, motivations aside. i do not always respond with this. nowadays i may not, and not because i have lost faith in people, but because perhaps today that is too simplistic for how i feel about my surroundings. if i ask someone for directions, i do not think that they ponder to themselves 'what would jesus do?' before answering me. no, they give the directions if they know them. maybe afterwards they think they behaved as jesus would have. but it wasn't their initial reason for helping me. that was just them, operating on reflex. is a reflex humanity or religion? nature or nurture? the giving of directions is a simple, perhaps banal, example. individuals consider their beliefs before a more monumental decision, perhaps. but aren't the every day exchanges between strangers as valuable as the big decisions?

perhaps that is ultimately what i mean when i say i believe in people. i believe that their humanity is their default setting, and not their set of beliefs which dictates they behave humanistically.

this train of logic demands a definition of what 'humanity' is and what behaving 'humanistically' means, which is a train i am too tired to board.



our conversation wheeled around similar cul-de-sacs and roundabouts, turning and twisting so often as one of us explained his beliefs and the other defended herself against what she felt were indirect accusations of being misguided, and without morals. he never explicitly said how he felt about those who do not subscribe to a particular faith; she foolishly never mentioned that she has an immense amount of respect for the faithful, in the same way that she respects long distance swimmers: with something akin to awe.

she didn't say that she was especially anxious about his opinion of her morals, or apparent lack of them. she did say, defensively, that she doesn't like it when people tell her what she should believe in (a sin he had not committed.) she didn't tell him that she was so anxious about his opinion because she wanted it to be positive. she didn't tell him that he made her head turn the first time she saw him. she didn't tell him that. she didn't ask how far his faith extends-will he touch a female? will he kiss one, or spend the night with one? she didn't even consider telling him that these are things she would like to do with him.

she did create metaphors, about the ocean, and its place as a deity in her life. a thing to command respect, but to also enjoy. to use as a compass, a navigational device. to fear, and observe, and indulge, and obey, and pray to.

she didn't say that she wanted to take him to her ocean. she hoped that the postcards, letters, visits, and now dinner had at least hinted at that. she didn't say that she hoped he had said yes for a reason other than some company and a meal.

she did say that she liked the painting he gave her. she did accept when he claimed it was 'his turn' to cook dinner. she didn't ask if that could be called a second date.

she didn't use terms like date. or like. or love.

she didn't say that her image of 'love' was as skewed as a kaleidoscope, constantly changing, sometimes beautiful and colourful, often dark and chaotic. she didn't manage to include that her parents are divorced, a fact that has always coloured her relationships, friendships, opinions. she didn't mention that she fears commitment as much as she does venomous snakes (both entities she feels she could get used to in the right context.) she didn't divulge that she adores her freedom and independence, but finds it often weighed down by an inescapable need to be held. she definitely didn't mention how skilled she is at keeping casual sex casual. how callously she can treat men when she wants to. she didn't admit that it's due to a fear of being vulnerable. and hurt.

she didn't tell him that she had chosen this opportunity to be vulnerable to him. that he was priviliged.

she didn't tell him that her breed of faith in humankind was radiant and glowing and alive in him.

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

robi roboty

i feel as though krakow is a city perched precariously on an edge, an edge with no parallel lines, no rounded edges. it teeters between its past and its future, inextricably tied to the former but yearning so hungrily for the latter. it wants to be exploited, but it does not want to be cheapened, to have its honour dulled. today i visited a museum-to-be, a one room exhibit which only began charging the pittance of 3-zl two weeks ago. what the future holds for the place one does not know. it is out of the way, hidden amongst car part shops and empty, weed-riddled lots. from the exhibit, we could look out onto the factory, but the man who took the money did not say we could walk out towards it. he also did not say we couldn't. which was just as well, because walking around it did little for one's attempt to grasp the gravity of the place or imagine it 65 years ago. standing outside the factory where oskar schindler 'saved' 1,100 jews from certain death did little to connect one to the people, the stories, the lives, did little to force one to place oneself in the context of this history and say 'this is my history; we are all members of the same story.'
at the same time, i was relieved. there was no maudlin re-creation of factory life, no workers' hut replicas, no gratuitous photos of schindler or his workers, no cartoons, no animation, no shrine to steven spielberg. it was simple and modest. in a time when a visit to oswiecim means maneuvering around loud school groups and camera-laden couples, the factory, and nearby plaszow, was a sweet reminder that we can still treat sombre events in history with dignity. this is not to say that one should not visit oswiecim or forget its relevance; indeed, the opposite. what is unfortunate for oswiecim is that is has the best pr. it is and should continue to be available to every member of the public.
what is unfortunate is the profusion of memorials erected around the world. i fear that in our haste to memorialise and build and make manifest our guilt and sorrow, we begin to forget the thing itself, and forget that things like it continue to happen in our world. there is nothing to differentiate the deaths of masses of people, and yet we hold onto One as an anchor, point to it and say 'this is bad,' but choose not to label as bad when modern governments declare unprovoked war, ignore contemporary genocide, or even re-label it as 'regional conflict'. if we must claim we are persistently memorialising the holocaust of the second world war in an effort to prevent its repetition, then we must take notice of the patterns being repeated right under our noses, and, indeed, cease the repetition.

i didn't mean to engage in this tangent. ah, well.

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

when i close my eyes, you reside on the inside of my eyelids. brown hair in a daze, glasses resting sagely on your nose, arms filling out the sleeves of a maroon t-shirt decorated with a yellow weevil. the path directly in your eyes leads beyond, further, a mess of smooth espresso that keeps me awake and alive. on the inside of my eyelids, i see you sideways, left side of your face pressed against a white cotton pillow. on the inside of my eyelids, i feel your warmth nearby as you lie with your face in the pillow. on the inside of my eyelids, i see your eyes open, gently, and crease at the sides as you smile a morning smile. on the inside of my eyelids, i see you on the top of a mountain, arms on hips, beaming at the crisp, blue eternity spreading before you like marmalade. on the inside of my eyelids, i see you teaching a child to ride a bicycle with two wheels. on the insisde of my eyelids, i smell your hair and feel your scalp. on the inside of my eyelids, i press the soles of my feet to yours. on the inside of my eyelids, i am pushing you into the sea, and you are pulling me in with you. on the inside of my eyelids, we are fully immersed in the sea, and in one another. on the inside of my eyelids, i hear you whispering to me, as i whisper to you, velvety secrets in our mother tongues. on the inside of my eyelids, i sing every song i love to you. on the inside of my eyelids, we are no less than perfection in each other's eyelids, and we see one another even when we blink.

Monday, May 22, 2006

continued but not entirely done

The first night I spent living in my car, I almost wet myself. Happily, this fact had nothing to do with any terror I may have felt over my first night homeless, but was actually due to the fact that I had failed to schedule one last sojourn to a public toilet before settling down to sleep. This was a mistake I would never make again.
I did not end up making many more mistakes that summer; at least, not many more mistakes that could be considered tactical errors. With each passing day, I discovered the finer points and the laws of survival as a homeless citizen. Within a week, I had black felt curtains taped up over the windows in the bed of my truck; by the end of the month, I knew which neighbourhoods lacked streetlamps and which supermarkets had public toilets available at eight in the morning. My nocturnal routine usually involved sitting in a Barnes and Noble, cheekily reading my own book and drinking my own tea until ten minutes prior to closing time, at which point I’d sneak off to the toilet to have my final wee and to brush my teeth. I would then get into my truck and drive to whichever quiet neighbourhood I’d decided on that day and park the car in the darkest location possible. At that point, all that was left was waiting until I was certain no local resident was peering at me through their curtains, then slithering quickly through the small window between the cab of the truck and the bed. From there, it was a simple matter of climbing into my sleeping bag without shaking the truck too violently. Strategically, I was getting by considerably well. I learned my lessons quickly. It was the other lessons I learned that summer that I found more difficult to digest.
A week before I moved into my mobile residence, I graduated Cum Laude from the University of California, Irvine. That same day, I moved out of the beach house I’d been sharing with three other girls who, nice as they were, found it difficult to mask their mild feelings of disgust that, in order to save money, I would rather be homeless for a time than move back into my mother’s house or pay rent in Orange County, which I couldn‘t afford anyhow. There was no talk of helping me out, which at least one of them was in a position to do. It didn’t matter. Even though we’d all light-heartedly acknowledged in the past that I was cut from a different grain of fabric than the three of them, that final year at university demonstrated just how striking that disparity was. What had made that year tolerable were the friends I maintained outside of the house, in particular my mate Lisa. The night of our graduation, I slept in the spare bedroom of her house after she and I got ridiculously drunk at a house party. There, I re-learned an important lesson I had already been taught during my academic tenure but had failed to remember after consuming a bottle of red wine entirely to myself: although I am indeed very good friends with tequila, she is an exceptionally jealous friend who refuses to be merely an encore to another alcoholic headliner. I was very sick. All over the carpet of the bedroom I was sleeping in. Fortunately, the girl who technically occupied that room hadn’t lived in it for months and wouldn’t be back to claim her possessions until the other housemates and I had vacated the premises at the end of the week.
Over the course of that week and for the rest of the summer I continued to work at the job I’d had since the new year, a job that paid well and impressed people because it was in the field of my degree. The combination of degree and relevant job meant that I found myself to be a member of a peculiar, and lonely, social class: Middle Class and Voluntarily Homeless. Any passing stranger would never guess that the 21-year old girl brushing past them was living out of her truck, because she lacked the physical traits they had long since learned to associate with homelessness. She wore clean clothing, was acceptably well-groomed, was sober, was walking with a purpose and not lazing about on a park bench. But if they had looked into her eyes, and they were particularly perceptive, they may have seen the dull aching and the desperation for empathy that is undoubtedly common to any human without a physical place to call home in this society.
As strong as I considered myself and as courageously as I had intended to survive my temporary lifestyle, I hadn’t expected the struggle I would come up against in my own mind. I could easily go about the routine of finding quiet neighbourhoods, of showering on the beach, and of brushing my teeth in a bookstore, and had I been able to completely shut off my brain, that routine would have faithfully seen me through. Instead, I found myself slowly going around the bend in loneliness and anxiety. It generally took me ninety minutes to fall asleep at night due to the panic that every approaching vehicle was a police car that had been called out by a nervous neighbour who, in my fantasies, was an excessively wealthy middle-aged woman with a brackish orange fake tan, nervously standing in the window with her cordless phone, wearing designer pyjamas (with her monogram stitched into it somewhere) whose two pre-teen children (Kiki and Ashlynn, names that provide the only convincing argument against atheism, because how else could people ridiculous enough to name their children Kiki and Ashlynn have accrued such vast amounts of wealth except via the machinations of a cruel and unforgiving god who loves to laugh itself silly) were waiting excitedly at the upstairs window for the cop to arrive, praying that the scene would unfold in such a way as to deliver a truly cracking story at school tomorrow. Usually at this point in the waking nightmare, I fell asleep.
I diplomatically kept these details of paranoia away from my mother’s ears. She phoned up periodically to ensure that I was still alive and still not in jail, two states of existence I was able to sustain for the duration of the summer. My mother hesitated in accepting my decision to live in my truck, but ultimately overruled her discomfort by realising that, in the end, she trusted me and my choices. This trust was a great comfort to me, and was what ultimately forced me to stay strong, to prove to her and to everyone else that I was capable of this task I had set before me. I also assuaged her fears by casually mentioning that I would sleep the odd night on some kind soul’s couch.
The truth of the matter was that after a few weeks I was spending as many nights on couches as I could, anywhere that didn’t involve the fear of cops or dogs or bright lights or angry Orange County Republicans with legally purchased, self-righteously loaded guns. Overwhelmingly, however, it was the desire to have company that drove me to ring up my friends at night, attempting to tactfully ask to spend that night in their living room. All of my closest friends who would have let me sleep on their floors as long as was necessary had unfortunately moved to or were already living in Los Angeles, which was just far enough away to make any sort of daily commute to work from their homes a fabulously stupid enterprise. The friends left in Orange County were a curious assortment of acquaintances, lukewarm comrades, and friends who I was destined to become closer to over the course of the summer. What brought that destiny to fruition was the loneliness I found creeping up all around me as I lay in my car, staring at the ceiling, wishing for nothing more in the world than a small room with a comfortable chair or sofa, a lamp, and a kettle coming to the boil. Above all, I yearned for that small room to contain other people. For those four years spent at university both in California and in England, I had spent nearly all of my time sharing sitting rooms, kitchens, pasta dinners, beds, bodily fluids, joints, books, music, bedrooms, and lecture notes. Being forcibly submerged into the cold water of solitary confinement was a shock I had not prepared for and I found myself floundering in it, grasping for the rope of human company that would lift me from those murky depths.
I had a few saviours scattered around the county, and while most were happy to be hospitable once or twice, few could be called upon frequently. I understood, deep down, why many would be unwilling to house me repeatedly, and was always truthful when, turned away, I said it was OK. What followed was a case of cognitive dissonance I chide myself for to this day because, though I hated myself for asking to crash on a couch in the first place, I found myself feeling resentment towards those who didn’t return my phone calls or who deflected responsibility onto housemates or partners. It was an insidious beast that took hold, for it was my survival instinct at its most odious, and I had been convinced that I was stronger than it was. I was extremely proud, and it took an enormous amount of courage to request a stay on a living room floor, for doing so meant that I was weak and scared and not at all the mature university graduate I was meant to be. What followed was hatred towards myself for resenting others, for they were merely going about their daily lives. What need have they to be concerned with me? I was desperate to be stronger than that. One day in early July, I was reminded of my task, and was given a chance to regain that strength.
I approached the Newport Beach Public Library as I had every other time. Usually I held a book or two in my hand to return, along with my keys and wallet. On this particular day, July 7th, I arrived before the library was open. I sat outside with the other patrons waiting to gain admission. I noticed a man opposite me. His clothes were somewhat dingy, and the duffel bag to his side suggested itself to be the sum total of his worldly possessions. My circumstances that summer had made me particularly sensitive to the presence and the plight of others in situations like mine, but incalculably more desperate. The man opposite me was in his late 30’s, with skin that had spent much time in the sun. He needed a shave, and probably a hug. As we sat there, two squad cars pulled up and parked wherever they damn well pleased. Two police officers emerged, in clean, crisp blue uniforms with shiny buttons and flattering sunglasses. My stomach tightened somewhat, but I knew there was no possible chance they were there because of me. My stomach stayed tightened when it realized they had come for the duffel bag man. I was too far away to hear the conversation that ensued between the three men, but from scraps I could pick up it sounded as though he had walked the circumference of the library. He claimed he was there to return some books. I heard little more, but my heart swelled and grieved for the man, for what possible criminal undertakings could he have been devising whilst walking around a library? His only crimes were being dirty and daring to mingle with the decent, respectable folk. I wondered what his business had been. Had he been scouting a place to sleep, as I often did? Had he merely been looking for the book drop window? Before I had a chance to ponder further, he was being patted down, and his hands being held behind his back. The library doors opened. Gratefully, for I was finding it difficult to stand by and watch any longer. I wasn’t able to meet his eyes before I scurried into the building, but I longed to communicate with him.
I sat down at a computer terminal, eager to distract myself from the absurdities occurring outside. I opened an email from a friend in England, whose email simply read, ‘I wanted to let everyone know that I am OK, and that neither Chris nor I have been in London recently.’ My blood instantly vaporised and my breathing became hurried and shallow. My fingers tripped over themselves to open the Guardian homepage, but once open, my fingers fell away from the keyboard and landed with a dead thud in my lap. Bombs. Carnage. The fluorescent jackets of rescue workers. I attempted to steady myself but was helpless to the confused sobbing that overtook me. Where was everyone? Were they OK? I had spent my third year of university in Norwich, England, and had there met with an unnaturally amazing group of friends, a group I had found to be a once-in-a-lifetime assembly of the most diverse proportions, all getting along suspiciously well, considering the university had thrown us all together at random into the same hall. They were the reason I was saving money this summer, for the plan was to return and live with them in their third year. To be with them, to drink tea with them, to go to the pub with them. These were the reasons to be homeless. I dashed out the door of the library, sprinting over the grass and pavement to my car. I dug out my address book and phone card and set to immediately phoning every single one of my friends, starting with the Londoners. Katy was completely unreachable. The phone wouldn’t even ring, the mobile networks jammed with people ringing loved ones. I next tried Chris who, as it turned out, was in Africa, and therefore safe, if not a little annoyed that I had just cost him some silly amount of money to make sure he was alive. Next on the list was Hannah, for she of all people would be the one to know everyone’s whereabouts. After two tries, there was her voice on the other end, alive and glowing.
‘Hannah! It’s Nika!’
‘Nika! Are you alright?’
‘Are you??!! I just found out.’
‘Yeah, we’re fine. I’m at the pub.’
And thus did I know that all was well. And thus was I empowered once more to be strong, for I had prepared myself to mourn for these people, and they were alright. Frankly, I knew deep down in my heart of hearts that they were alright, for the chances of any of them being in London were slim, they being far more inclined to stay at home and watch telly, followed by a spliff, followed by a frozen pizza, followed by the pub. The world as I knew it had only slightly been shaken, after all.
What I took from that episode, however, was a newly resolved drive to persevere. At that time, as well, my friend Christy insisted that anytime I needed it, her floor was mine. Christy and I had only met that year, as she had transferred to UCI while I was away in England. We were in the same course, but it was the fact that we were also co-workers that made us friends. That summer saw Christy become something of a godsend for me, as she frequently handed me the key to her front door and said, ‘Help yourself.’ My mother sent my post to Christy’s house. In fact, were it not for the delicate relationship with her somewhat older housemate Kathleen, Christy would have assured me permanent residence in her apartment.
In hindsight, I have to inevitably be glad that Kathleen was such a mesh of barbed wire of a woman, for had I been able to have long-term squatting rights in Christy’s home, I would not have proven to myself that I could do it. I would not have the ability to look at myself and say that I sacrificed in order to make something happen. Perhaps more importantly, had I not had that summer of life outside a home, perhaps I never would have even paid attention to the man with the duffel bag, his humanity made more acute through my empathy. I do not now see a homeless man and know exactly what his life is like, because to be quite truthful, I have never been where he is. Mine was a privileged and paltry variety of destitution. However, through being vagrant and longing for the company of others, my conviction that it is for others that we live and because of others that we survive has been buttressed. And I know that my reckless resolution to be strong all of the time was not folly because I am weak, but because no one is so strong that they do not require the support of their friends and families.
But, really, everyone should try showering on the beach.

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

we are not people of passion. we don't run our lives through the spin cycle then hang them on the line in front of our neighbours. our conversations of depth are accidents, our moments of tenderness jarring.

we almost love one another too much for the present circumstances-ex's who live in the same house after being on opposite ends of the earth for a year. our friendship is full of contradictions. we are close but distant; we are platonic yet tender. most of all, we care deeply about one another in a way that takes our eye off the path and we're suddenly lost, uncertain where to place our feet, terrified of what will happen when the sun sets. i find myself full of joy to know you've figured out where to take your life; i find myself feeling like i've been punched in the stomach when other girls are mentioned.

but we are not people of passion. we discuss it over a joint, we lie down in your bed together, touching one another for the first time in a year and a half. we discuss that last girlfriend, who you describe like a fling. we talk. we touch. but we are not people of passion. we do not shout when we disagree. we do not grope or lick or even seek skin below clothing. we talk quietly, almost whispering. we touch, lightly.

we are not people of passion.